By this point arbitrary properties have been validated to be parsable. They aren’t valid candidates if they can’t be parsed (because they won’t produce valid CSS). This means all the checks in here can go away because the candidate parsing has handled it already.
* update regex extractor
* implement `matchVariant` API
* add `matchVariant` test
* add `values` option to the `matchVariant` API
* move `matchVariant` tests to own file
* update changelog
* WIP
Still need to write error message
* Update error message
first pass at something better
* Detect invalid variant formats returned by functions
* Add proper error message
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
* register arbitrary variants
With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new
variants.
You can use it as:
```js
addVariant('children', '& > *')
```
Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a
reference for the candidate, which means that:
```html
children:pl-4
```
Will result in:
```css
.children\:pl-4 > * { .. }
```
Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`.
We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means
that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside
a variant directly. An example of this can be:
```html
<ul class="[&>*]:underline">
<li>A</li>
<li>B</li>
<li>C</li>
</ul>
```
Which generates the following css:
```css
.\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * {
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
```
Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector
itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the
selector itself, it is just escaped.
* add tests for arbitrary variants
This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it
all works with existing code.
* update changelog
* Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants
* Refactor
* Add support for at rules
* Add test for attribute selectors
* Fix test
* Add attribute selector support
* Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine
We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough”
* Split variants by separator at the top-level only
This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets
* Fix extraction when using custom variant separators
* Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants
* Add a second multi-character separator test
* Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes
* Add nested at-rule tests
* Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant
* Add test for using with `@apply`
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me>
Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
* Add failing test cases
* Flatten finalizeSelector code
* Use AST operations to format selector classes
With this change we only parse the selector once and operate on the AST until we need to turn it back into a selector. In addition this lets us solve an issue where .replace(…) did the wrong thing because it doesn’t understand that .base and .base-foo are two different classes
* Remove extraneous, non-matching selectors from utilities
* Update changelog
* Only check selectors containing base apply candidates for circular dependencies
When given a two rule like `html.dark .a, .b { … }` and `html.dark .c { @apply b }` we would see `.dark` in both the base rule and the rule being applied and consider it a circular dependency. However, the selectors `html.dark .a` and `.b` are considered on their own and is therefore do not introduce a circular dependency.
This better matches the user’s mental model that the selectors are just two definitions sharing the same properties.
* Update changelog
* Fix intellisense for plugins with multiple `@apply` rules
Intellisense uses `expandApplyAtRules` directly and doesn’t partition them. When a plugin registers components using something like `”@apply flex”: {}` more than once in the same component intellisense will break. This isn’t a problem for Tailwind CSS proper because we do rule partitioning. Given that Intellisense is using it directly though we shouldn’t outright break in the face of this situation even if the result isn’t 100% accurate (the source maps won’t be correct in this case).
* Update changelog
Co-authored-by: psucoder <hungle.info@gmail.com>
