Fix issue where couldn't apply variant classes to rule with multiple selectors
This commit is contained in:
parent
2903811767
commit
86288cd90b
2 changed files with 39 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
import _ from 'lodash'
|
||||
import _, { replace } from 'lodash'
|
||||
import selectorParser from 'postcss-selector-parser'
|
||||
import postcss from 'postcss'
|
||||
import substituteTailwindAtRules from '../lib/substituteTailwindAtRules'
|
||||
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ const tailwindApplyPlaceholder = selectorParser.attribute({
|
|||
attribute: '__TAILWIND-APPLY-PLACEHOLDER__',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
function generateRulesFromApply({ rule, utilityName: className, classPosition }, replaceWith) {
|
||||
function generateRulesFromApply({ rule, utilityName: className, classPosition }, replaceWiths) {
|
||||
const parser = selectorParser(selectors => {
|
||||
let i = 0
|
||||
selectors.walkClasses(c => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ function generateRulesFromApply({ rule, utilityName: className, classPosition },
|
|||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const processedSelectors = rule.selectors.map(selector => {
|
||||
const processedSelectors = _.flatMap(rule.selectors, selector => {
|
||||
// You could argue we should make this replacement at the AST level, but if we believe
|
||||
// the placeholder string is safe from collisions then it is safe to do this is a simple
|
||||
// string replacement, and much, much faster.
|
||||
return parser.processSync(selector).replace('[__TAILWIND-APPLY-PLACEHOLDER__]', replaceWith)
|
||||
return replaceWiths.map(replaceWith =>
|
||||
parser.processSync(selector).replace('[__TAILWIND-APPLY-PLACEHOLDER__]', replaceWith)
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const cloned = rule.clone()
|
||||
|
|
@ -242,7 +244,7 @@ function processApplyAtRules(css, lookupTree, config) {
|
|||
// Get new rules with the utility portion of the selector replaced with the new selector
|
||||
const rulesToInsert = [
|
||||
...applys.map(applyUtility => {
|
||||
return generateRulesFromApply(applyUtility, rule.selector)
|
||||
return generateRulesFromApply(applyUtility, rule.selectors)
|
||||
}),
|
||||
afterRule,
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue