tailwindcss/src/lib/defaultExtractor.js

183 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

import { flagEnabled } from '../featureFlags.js'
import * as regex from './regex'
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
export function defaultExtractor(context) {
let patterns = Array.from(buildRegExps(context))
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
/**
* @param {string} content
*/
return (content) => {
/** @type {(string|string)[]} */
let results = []
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
for (let pattern of patterns) {
results.push(...(content.match(pattern) ?? []))
}
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
return results.filter((v) => v !== undefined).map(clipAtBalancedParens)
}
}
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
function* buildRegExps(context) {
let separator = context.tailwindConfig.separator
let variantGroupingEnabled = flagEnabled(context.tailwindConfig, 'variantGrouping')
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
yield regex.pattern([
// Variants
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
'((?=((',
regex.any(
[
regex.pattern([/([^\s"'\[\\]+-)?\[[^\s"'\\]+\]/, separator]),
regex.pattern([/[^\s"'\[\\]+/, separator]),
],
Arbitrary variants (#8299) * register arbitrary variants With the new `addVariant` API, we have a beautiful way of creating new variants. You can use it as: ```js addVariant('children', '& > *') ``` Now you can use the `children:` variant. The API uses a `&` as a reference for the candidate, which means that: ```html children:pl-4 ``` Will result in: ```css .children\:pl-4 > * { .. } ``` Notice that the `&` was replaced by `.children\:pl-4`. We can leverage this API to implement arbitrary variants, this means that you can write those `&>*` (Notice that we don't have spaces) inside a variant directly. An example of this can be: ```html <ul class="[&>*]:underline"> <li>A</li> <li>B</li> <li>C</li> </ul> ``` Which generates the following css: ```css .\[\&\>\*\]\:underline > * { text-decoration-line: underline; } ``` Now all the children of the `ul` will have an `underline`. The selector itself is a bit crazy since it contains the candidate which is the selector itself, it is just escaped. * add tests for arbitrary variants This still requires some work to the `defaultExtractor` to make sure it all works with existing code. * update changelog * Fix candidate detection for arbitrary variants * Refactor * Add support for at rules * Add test for attribute selectors * Fix test * Add attribute selector support * Split top-level comma parsing into a generalized splitting routine We can now split on any character at the top level with any nesting. We don’t balance brackets directly here but this is probably “enough” * Split variants by separator at the top-level only This means that the separator has to be ouside of balanced brackets * Fix extraction when using custom variant separators * Support custom separators when top-level splitting variants * Add a second multi-character separator test * Split tests for at-rule and at-rule with selector changes * Add nested at-rule tests * Fix space-less at-rule parsing in addVariant * Add test for using with `@apply` Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <jordan@cryptica.me> Co-authored-by: Adam Wathan <adam.wathan@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 18:24:59 +02:00
true
),
')+))\\2)?',
// Important (optional)
/!?/,
regex.any([
// Arbitrary properties
/\[[^\s:'"]+:[^\s\]]+\]/,
// Utilities
regex.pattern([
// Utility Name / Group Name
variantGroupingEnabled ? /-?(?:[\w,()]+)/ : /-?(?:\w+)/,
// Normal/Arbitrary values
regex.optional(
regex.any([
regex.pattern([
// Arbitrary values
/-\[[^\s:]+\]/,
// Not immediately followed by an `{[(`
/(?![{([]])/,
// optionally followed by an opacity modifier
/(?:\/[^\s'"\\$]*)?/,
]),
regex.pattern([
// Arbitrary values
/-\[[^\s]+\]/,
// Not immediately followed by an `{[(`
/(?![{([]])/,
// optionally followed by an opacity modifier
/(?:\/[^\s'"\\$]*)?/,
]),
// Normal values w/o quotes — may include an opacity modifier
/[-\/][^\s'"\\$={]*/,
])
),
]),
]),
])
// 5. Inner matches
// yield /[^<>"'`\s.(){}[\]#=%$]*[^<>"'`\s.(){}[\]#=%:$]/g
}
// We want to capture any "special" characters
// AND the characters immediately following them (if there is one)
let SPECIALS = /([\[\]'"`])([^\[\]'"`])?/g
let ALLOWED_CLASS_CHARACTERS = /[^"'`\s<>\]]+/
/**
* Clips a string ensuring that parentheses, quotes, etc… are balanced
* Used for arbitrary values only
*
* We will go past the end of the balanced parens until we find a non-class character
*
* Depth matching behavior:
* w-[calc(100%-theme('spacing[some_key][1.5]'))]']
* ┬ ┬ ┬┬ ┬ ┬┬ ┬┬┬┬┬┬┬
* 1 2 3 4 34 3 210 END
* ╰────┴──────────┴────────┴────────┴┴───┴─┴┴┴
*
* @param {string} input
*/
function clipAtBalancedParens(input) {
// We are care about this for arbitrary values
if (!input.includes('-[')) {
return input
}
let depth = 0
let openStringTypes = []
// Find all parens, brackets, quotes, etc
// Stop when we end at a balanced pair
// This is naive and will treat mismatched parens as balanced
// This shouldn't be a problem in practice though
let matches = input.matchAll(SPECIALS)
// We can't use lookbehind assertions because we have to support Safari
// So, instead, we've emulated it using capture groups and we'll re-work the matches to accommodate
matches = Array.from(matches).flatMap((match) => {
const [, ...groups] = match
return groups.map((group, idx) =>
Object.assign([], match, {
index: match.index + idx,
0: group,
})
)
})
for (let match of matches) {
let char = match[0]
let inStringType = openStringTypes[openStringTypes.length - 1]
if (char === inStringType) {
openStringTypes.pop()
} else if (char === "'" || char === '"' || char === '`') {
openStringTypes.push(char)
}
if (inStringType) {
continue
} else if (char === '[') {
depth++
continue
} else if (char === ']') {
depth--
continue
}
// We've gone one character past the point where we should stop
// This means that there was an extra closing `]`
// We'll clip to just before it
if (depth < 0) {
return input.substring(0, match.index)
}
// We've finished balancing the brackets but there still may be characters that can be included
// For example in the class `text-[#336699]/[.35]`
// The depth goes to `0` at the closing `]` but goes up again at the `[`
// If we're at zero and encounter a non-class character then we clip the class there
if (depth === 0 && !ALLOWED_CLASS_CHARACTERS.test(char)) {
return input.substring(0, match.index)
}
}
return input
}
// Regular utilities
// {{modifier}:}*{namespace}{-{suffix}}*{/{opacityModifier}}?
// Arbitrary values
// {{modifier}:}*{namespace}-[{arbitraryValue}]{/{opacityModifier}}?
// arbitraryValue: no whitespace, balanced quotes unless within quotes, balanced brackets unless within quotes
// Arbitrary properties
// {{modifier}:}*[{validCssPropertyName}:{arbitraryValue}]