updated README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
58837eaf41
commit
a41e7fc1c0
1 changed files with 2 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -12,16 +12,13 @@ You just have to type:
|
|||
pip install construct-typing
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
I'm mostly working with VSCode and Pylance (which works really great) ??? But i have also tested the stubs with mypy. ????
|
||||
|
||||
## Tests
|
||||
The stubs are tested against the pytests of the *construct* package in a slightly modified form. Since the tests are relatively detailed I think most cases are covered.
|
||||
The new typed constructs have new written tests.
|
||||
|
||||
The tests do not generate errors with:
|
||||
- [x] mypy
|
||||
- [ ] pyright (TODO: Some errors in pyright have to be fixed first)
|
||||
- [ ] pyright / pylance (TODO: Some errors in pyright have to be fixed first)
|
||||
|
||||
## Explanation
|
||||
### Stubs
|
||||
|
|
@ -57,7 +54,7 @@ It implements the following new constructs:
|
|||
- `TEnum`: similar to `construct.Enum` but strictly tied to a `TEnumBase` class
|
||||
- `TFlagsEnum`: similar to `construct.FlagsEnum` but strictly tied to a `TFlagsEnumBase` class
|
||||
|
||||
These types are strongly typed, which means that there is no difference between the `ParsedType` and the `BuildTypes`. So to build one of the constructs the correct type is enforced. The disadvantage is that the code gets a little bit longer, because you can not for example use a normal `dict` to build an object. But the big advantage is, that if you use the correct container type instead of a `dict`, the static code analyses can do its magic and find potential errors.
|
||||
These types are strongly typed, which means that there is no difference between the `ParsedType` and the `BuildTypes`. So to build one of the constructs the correct type is enforced. The disadvantage is that the code will be a little bit longer, because you can not for example use a normal `dict` to build an `TStruct`. But the big advantage is, that if you use the correct container type instead of a `dict`, the static code analyses can do its magic and find potential type errors and missing values.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A short example:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue