Move the 'interlaced' flag to this element (arbitrarily set to 16bits).
This should allow better detection/selection of profiles.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
In some situations, MMAL won't return a decoded frame for certain input
frames. This can happen if a frame fails to decode, or if a packet does
not actually contain a complete frame. In these situations, we would
deadlock (or actually timeout) waiting for an expected output frame,
which is not ideal. On the other hand, there are situations where we
definitely have to block to avoid deadlocks. (This mess is a
consequence of trying to map MMAL's asynchronous and flexible
dataflow to libavcodec, which is more static and rigid.)
Solve this by doing a blocking wait only if the amount of buffered data
is too big. The whole purpose of the blocking wait is to avoid excessive
buffering of input data, so we can skip it if it appears to be low. The
consequence is that libavcodec can gracefully return no frame to the
API user.
We want to track the number of full packets to make our heuristic work.
But MMAL buffers are fixed-size, requiring splitting large packets. This
is why the previous commit is needed. We use the ..._FRAME_END flag to
remember packet boundaries, but MMAL does not preserve these buffer
flags when returning buffers to the user.
Signed-off-by: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
The next commit needs 1 bit of additional information per MMAL buffer
sent to the MMAL input port. This information will be needed when the
buffer is recycled (i.e. returned by the input port's callback).
Normally, we could use MMAL_BUFFER_HEADER_FLAG_USER0, but that is
unexpectedly not preserved.
Do this by storing a pointer to FFBufferEntry in the MMAL buffer's
user data, instead of an AVBufferRef. This also changes the lifetime
of FFBufferEntry.
Signed-off-by: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
When compiled with --disable-pthreads, e.g
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20150917015044&slot=alpha-debian-qemu-gcc-4.7,
a bunch of -Wunused-functions are reported due to missing header guards
around threading related functions.
This patch should silence such warnings.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
The intended meaning is "if this block is the first block in a slice then
its left boundary is a slice boundary". Silence a logical-not-parentheses
warning from gcc.
Silence a warning due to frame assignment in dvenc. All uses of the
reference in dvdec are read only, except the ones in the main decoding
function, so use the frame pointer directly there.
Assumes 'GA94' format (ATSC standard)
Signed-off-by: DHE <git@dehacked.net>
Tested-by: Anshul <anshul.ffmpeg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Fixes: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/attachment/ticket/685/movie.264
In the available testcase the actual PPS only uses a few bits
while there are 7kbyte of apparently random data after it
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This affects Annex B streams (such as demuxed from .ts and others). It
also handles the format change in reinit-large_420_8-to-small_420_8.h264
correctly.
Instead of passing through the extradata, create it on the fly it from
the currently active SPS and PPS. Since reconstructing the PPS and SPS
NALs would be very complicated and verbose, we use the NALs as they
originally appeared in the bitstream.
The code for writing the extradata is somewhat derived from
libavformat/avc.c, but it's small and different enough that sharing it
is not really worth it.
We assume an upper bound of 4096 bytes for each raw SPS/PPS. It's hard
to determine an exact maximum size, but this value was was considered
high enough and safe.
Needed for the following VideotoolBox commit.
The current one, while correct, does not yield the best possible
results. The specificiations suggest another formula, which results
in quality gains in the decoded output from fate tests. This
justifies changing said formula.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
CID 1256 is specified as using the same table for luma and chroma,
which is the same as CID 1235 luma table. This is consistent with
the format supposedly being RGB, although most sequences seem to
actually be YCbCr-encoded.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
Tables 1258 and 1259 were not zigzagged when added, so it was not
possible to notice the equivalence.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
